←back to thread

842 points putzdown | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.25s | source
Show context
jghn ◴[] No.43693238[source]
The other day I saw the results of a poll [1] where 80% of Americans thought the *country* would be better off if more Americans worked in factories. However, only 20% of Americans thought that *they* would be better off if more Americans worked in factories. It was surprisingly bipartisan.

In other words, people like the idea of this, but no one actually wants this.

[1] https://www.ft.com/content/845917ed-41a5-449f-946f-70263adba...

replies(16): >>43693320 #>>43693546 #>>43693731 #>>43694045 #>>43694194 #>>43698985 #>>43704131 #>>43704159 #>>43704862 #>>43705440 #>>43705572 #>>43706240 #>>43706661 #>>43707463 #>>43725836 #>>43737326 #
MetaWhirledPeas ◴[] No.43706240[source]
> people like the idea of this, but no one actually wants this

As others have pointed out, this is not a contradiction. (Read their reply.)

However, the question of 'Do YOU want to work in a factory?' is heavily influenced by the fact that we don't see factory work as a high-paying career, or a career at all. Part of the solution to the factory problem is enhancing the value proposition for the employees.

I am ambivalent toward tariffs, but the idea is that if we make foreign products more expensive then the higher price of domestic goods becomes more palatable by comparison. If paying domestic workers more raises the price of domestic goods, and if people are willing to pay that price for whatever reason, you will start to see growth in manufacturing.

It's also silly to reject long-term goals simply because achieving them is difficult.

replies(3): >>43706503 #>>43706512 #>>43707387 #
runako ◴[] No.43707387[source]
> If paying domestic workers more raises the price of domestic goods, and if people are willing to pay that price for whatever reason, you will start to see growth in manufacturing.

We ran this experiment for decades. It turns out that Americans are not willing to pay the higher prices, which led to our manufacturing consolidating around higher-value items.

This notion that we should move Americans from high-productivity jobs to lower-productivity jobs, and that such move will somehow enhance our prosperity is nutty. Lower-productivity jobs mean less income for workers, means less income in the system, means lower prosperity for all Americans. Moving tens of millions Americans to higher-productivity jobs while maintaining relatively low unemployment has to be seen as one of the economic success stories of the modern age.

Separately, Americans do not feel like this happened. That's a different discussion, about allocation of wealth. Our poorest states have higher GDPs per capita than many "rich" western EU countries. Mississippi has a higher GDP per capita than the UK. The difference is that the US has designed a system where every citizen lives a precarious existence, potentially a few months from destitution while other rich countries have not done that. We are allowed to make different choices in the US if we don't like this outcome.

replies(2): >>43707881 #>>43725743 #
1. user777777 ◴[] No.43725743[source]
This is spot on. To add, it won’t even matter the outcome of upending our entire society and economy this way (tariffs) if the wealth distribution remains unequal. Nor will these types of jobs equalize wealth distribution (which is never mentioned because that probably sounds like communism) Look at the poor factory workers in china! You want to bring that here? Insanity.