On the other hand, more people to arrest or crack down on? And then they can't vote, so that's parsimonious for some actors.
It's a direct ultimatum: radicalize/encourage the targets, or lose the contract.
At least the government spokesperson is focusing on the actual crime, and not the "we'll report on political opponents" service.
While the scale is certainly limited, the judgement is not. Cops have been known to use convicted sex criminals, and even medically diagnosed psychopaths to either entrap, provocateur or as foreign agents. There is a famous case in Iceland where the FBI used a convicted sex felon and a known psychopath Siggi Hakkari as a foreign agent to spy in the Icelandic Parliament. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigurdur_Thordarson)
With cops we can safely assume a complete lack of morality and judgement.
Like that time we funded a minor regional insurgency that went on to a) kick out the Russians b) run their own country c) attack us d) kick us out e) run their own country.
The feds losing control of their assets has been a meme ever since Kennedy ate a bullet.
Hey, that's not fair. The problem of governments running authoritarian operations that have wider reaching consequences as they spiral out of State control is MUCH older than that...
The cynical take is that the whole "law-abiding citizens" differentiation is just a way to say "I want this focused on out-group, not targeting in-group bad guys we're not interested in prosecuting". Think about who runs around saying "true Americans" or "patriots" to mean "my coalition" as opposed to a more objective definition.
Alea iacta est