←back to thread

555 points maheshrijal | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
georgewsinger ◴[] No.43707951[source]
Very impressive! But under arguably the most important benchmark -- SWE-bench verified for real-world coding tasks -- Claude 3.7 still remains the champion.[1]

Incredible how resilient Claude models have been for best-in-coding class.

[1] But by only about 1%, and inclusive of Claude's "custom scaffold" augmentation (which in practice I assume almost no one uses?). The new OpenAI models might still be effectively best in class now (or likely beating Claude with similar augmentation?).

replies(7): >>43708008 #>>43708068 #>>43708249 #>>43708545 #>>43709203 #>>43713202 #>>43716307 #
jjani ◴[] No.43708068[source]
Gemini 2.5 Pro is widely considered superior to 3.7 Sonnet now by heavy users, but they don't have an SWE-bench score. Shows that looking at one such benchmark isn't very telling. Main advantage over Sonnet being that it's better at using a large amount of context, which is enormously helpful during coding tasks.

Sonnet is still an incredibly impressive model as it held the crown for 6 months, which may as well be a decade with the current pace of LLM improvement.

replies(6): >>43708198 #>>43709336 #>>43710444 #>>43712513 #>>43714843 #>>43720979 #
unsupp0rted ◴[] No.43708198[source]
Main advantage over Sonnet is Gemini 2.5 doesn't try to make a bunch of unrelated changes like it's rewriting my project from scratch.
replies(6): >>43708296 #>>43708338 #>>43708390 #>>43708580 #>>43708811 #>>43709225 #
itsmevictor ◴[] No.43708296[source]
I find Gemini 2.5 truly remarkable and overall better than Claude, which I was a big fan of
replies(1): >>43708611 #
enraged_camel ◴[] No.43708611[source]
Still doesn't work well in Cursor unfortunately.
replies(3): >>43709559 #>>43710997 #>>43712870 #
1. pdntspa ◴[] No.43712870[source]
Cline/Roo Code work fine with it