Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    OpenAI o3 and o4-mini

    (openai.com)
    555 points maheshrijal | 12 comments | 16 Apr 25 17:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.474s | source | bottom
    1. burke ◴[16 Apr 25 17:16 UTC] No.43707912[source]▶
    It's pretty frustrating to see a press release with "Try on ChatGPT" and then not see the models available even though I'm paying them $200/mo.
    replies(6): >>43707920 #>>43707975 #>>43707988 #>>43708378 #>>43708732 #>>43711405 #
    2. _bin_ ◴[16 Apr 25 17:17 UTC] No.43707920[source]▶
    I see o4-mini on the $20 tier but no o3.
    3. ◴[16 Apr 25 17:22 UTC] No.43707975[source]▶
    4. TuxSH ◴[16 Apr 25 17:22 UTC] No.43707988[source]▶
    They're supposed to be released today for everyone, and o3-pro for Pro users in a few weeks:

    "ChatGPT Plus, Pro, and Team users will see o3, o4-mini, and o4-mini-high in the model selector starting today, replacing o1, o3‑mini, and o3‑mini‑high."

    with rate limits unchanged

    5. wilg ◴[16 Apr 25 17:51 UTC] No.43708378[source]▶
    They are all now available on the Pro plan. Y'all really ought to have a little bit more grace to wait 30 minutes after the announcement for the rollout.
    replies(1): >>43708547 #
    6. drcongo ◴[16 Apr 25 18:06 UTC] No.43708547[source]▶
    Or maybe OpenAI could wait until they'd released it before telling people to use it now.
    replies(3): >>43708985 #>>43711049 #>>43721587 #
    7. brcmthrowaway ◴[16 Apr 25 18:25 UTC] No.43708732[source]▶
    Holy crap... thats expensive.
    8. ◴[16 Apr 25 18:49 UTC] No.43708985{3}[source]▶
    9. squeaky-clean ◴[16 Apr 25 22:29 UTC] No.43711049{3}[source]▶
    They'd probably want their announcement to be the one the press picks up instead of a tweet or reddit post saying "Did anyone else notice the new ChatGPT model?"
    10. beejiu ◴[16 Apr 25 23:24 UTC] No.43711405[source]▶
    Why pay $200/mo when you can just access the models from the Platform playground?
    replies(1): >>43713141 #
    11. alphabettsy ◴[17 Apr 25 04:31 UTC] No.43713141[source]▶
    Higher limits and operator access maybe?
    12. wilg ◴[17 Apr 25 20:06 UTC] No.43721587{3}[source]▶
    Deploying several things is sometimes tricky and this could not be a smaller deal.