←back to thread

Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash

(petapixel.com)
554 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | 11 Apr 25 14:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
megaman821 ◴[11 Apr 25 15:14 UTC] No.43654757[source]▶
As a lurker on both Bluesky and Twitter, I find Bluesky is a much more hostile place. Twitter is much more absurd but there is not as much anger.
replies(25): >>43654879 #>>43654911 #>>43654964 #>>43654978 #>>43654981 #>>43655179 #>>43658062 #>>43658076 #>>43658200 #>>43658690 #>>43659029 #>>43659158 #>>43659250 #>>43659251 #>>43659639 #>>43659684 #>>43659724 #>>43659908 #>>43660101 #>>43660296 #>>43660933 #>>43661119 #>>43665491 #>>43667438 #>>43667522 #
Molitor5901 ◴[11 Apr 25 15:46 UTC] No.43655179[source]▶
I'm pretty left leaning and I don't like Bluesky. For me, it's too hostile and too much of an angry echo chamber. X is scattered wildly but I with muting I have been able to shape to get a more reasonable feed.
replies(8): >>43655251 #>>43657988 #>>43658077 #>>43658450 #>>43659445 #>>43659596 #>>43660179 #>>43663891 #
jghn ◴[11 Apr 25 20:55 UTC] No.43658450[source]▶
I don't understand why people struggle with either site. Follow only people you want to see. Both sites allow you to only see posts from those accounts. Problem solved.
replies(3): >>43658542 #>>43658647 #>>43659568 #
spiderice ◴[11 Apr 25 21:03 UTC] No.43658542[source]▶
Unless you want to follow Adobe, who were just driven out by a mob of angry people
replies(2): >>43658588 #>>43660010 #
rchaud ◴[11 Apr 25 23:55 UTC] No.43660010[source]▶
Our deepest condolences. Losing a marketing bullhorn is always difficult.
replies(2): >>43661439 #>>43663942 #
1. spiderice ◴[12 Apr 25 04:47 UTC] No.43661439[source]▶
Ok I guess I'll simplify the point for you: You can't follow the "people you want to see" if the platform is so hostile that the people you want to see are driven from it.

My comment wasn't just about Adobe