(petapixel.com)

554 points bookofjoe | 4 comments | 11 Apr 25 14:01 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Show context

megaman821 ◴[11 Apr 25 15:14 UTC] No.43654757[source]▶

As a lurker on both Bluesky and Twitter, I find Bluesky is a much more hostile place. Twitter is much more absurd but there is not as much anger.

replies(25): >>43654879 #>>43654911 #>>43654964 #>>43654978 #>>43654981 #>>43655179 #>>43658062 #>>43658076 #>>43658200 #>>43658690 #>>43659029 #>>43659158 #>>43659250 #>>43659251 #>>43659639 #>>43659684 #>>43659724 #>>43659908 #>>43660101 #>>43660296 #>>43660933 #>>43661119 #>>43665491 #>>43667438 #>>43667522 #

1. homefree ◴[11 Apr 25 22:13 UTC] No.43659250[source]▶

>>43654757 #

Bluesky is the worst of old Twitter concentrated into one place. It's some weird mixture of the hall monitors of Mastodon crossed with wannabe members of the weather underground. Like a leftwing Gab full of only Kara Swisher and Taylor Lorenz types. This sort of of faux outrage at adobe is par for the course - its awful over there.

X is much more of an ideological mix.

replies(2): >>43660951 #>>43662745 #

2. thatnerdyguy ◴[12 Apr 25 02:57 UTC] No.43660951[source]▶

>>43659250 (TP) #

My X experience was far more partisan than Bluesky. Not being able to get away from seeing the latest thoughts of user numero uno was also a turn off.

3. huhkerrf ◴[12 Apr 25 09:13 UTC] No.43662745[source]▶

>>43659250 (TP) #

I've heard it described as Digital Canada, which I think is just the perfect description.

replies(1): >>43667288 #

4. zifpanachr23 ◴[12 Apr 25 19:30 UTC] No.43667288[source]▶

>>43662745 #

Lmao

↑

Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash