←back to thread

Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash

(petapixel.com)

553 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | 11 Apr 25 14:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.349s | source

Show context

megaman821 ◴[11 Apr 25 15:14 UTC] No.43654757[source]▶

>>43653885 (OP) #

As a lurker on both Bluesky and Twitter, I find Bluesky is a much more hostile place. Twitter is much more absurd but there is not as much anger.

replies(25): >>43654879 #>>43654911 #>>43654964 #>>43654978 #>>43654981 #>>43655179 #>>43658062 #>>43658076 #>>43658200 #>>43658690 #>>43659029 #>>43659158 #>>43659250 #>>43659251 #>>43659639 #>>43659684 #>>43659724 #>>43659908 #>>43660101 #>>43660296 #>>43660933 #>>43661119 #>>43665491 #>>43667438 #>>43667522 #

1. llm_nerd ◴[11 Apr 25 21:51 UTC] No.43659029[source]▶

Bluesky currently has the kuro5hin "A Group Is It's Own Worst Enemy" effect going on. People who think they claimed land first believe that they get to define the future of the service for everyone else.

It's obnoxious, and if the service truly offers a real alternative to Twitter it needs to squash these brigading groups. I get that people don't want to see the posts of brands...so don't follow them. It's incredibly simple. I don't want furry content but I don't run around the platform complaining that some do.