←back to thread

Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash

(petapixel.com)
553 points bookofjoe | 4 comments | 11 Apr 25 14:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.013s | source
Show context
megaman821 ◴[11 Apr 25 15:14 UTC] No.43654757[source]▶
As a lurker on both Bluesky and Twitter, I find Bluesky is a much more hostile place. Twitter is much more absurd but there is not as much anger.
replies(25): >>43654879 #>>43654911 #>>43654964 #>>43654978 #>>43654981 #>>43655179 #>>43658062 #>>43658076 #>>43658200 #>>43658690 #>>43659029 #>>43659158 #>>43659250 #>>43659251 #>>43659639 #>>43659684 #>>43659724 #>>43659908 #>>43660101 #>>43660296 #>>43660933 #>>43661119 #>>43665491 #>>43667438 #>>43667522 #
Molitor5901 ◴[11 Apr 25 15:46 UTC] No.43655179[source]▶
I'm pretty left leaning and I don't like Bluesky. For me, it's too hostile and too much of an angry echo chamber. X is scattered wildly but I with muting I have been able to shape to get a more reasonable feed.
replies(8): >>43655251 #>>43657988 #>>43658077 #>>43658450 #>>43659445 #>>43659596 #>>43660179 #>>43663891 #
jghn ◴[11 Apr 25 20:55 UTC] No.43658450[source]▶
I don't understand why people struggle with either site. Follow only people you want to see. Both sites allow you to only see posts from those accounts. Problem solved.
replies(3): >>43658542 #>>43658647 #>>43659568 #
1. maw ◴[11 Apr 25 21:12 UTC] No.43658647[source]▶
And what about the people who sometimes post interesting things and sometimes post distilled insanity? They're incentivized to do so.
replies(3): >>43658782 #>>43658856 #>>43659291 #
2. jghn ◴[11 Apr 25 21:25 UTC] No.43658782[source]▶
Do you want to follow them or not? Up to you. No one is incentivized to do anything other than post what they want and follow who they want.
3. 98codes ◴[11 Apr 25 21:33 UTC] No.43658856[source]▶
Then you decide if the positives outweigh the negatives and unfollow them or not.

This particular situation is why the only thing I miss from Twitter at this point is the ability to mute an account's reposts rather than the full account.

4. ◴[11 Apr 25 22:18 UTC] No.43659291[source]▶