←back to thread

Adobe deletes Bluesky posts after backlash

(petapixel.com)
554 points bookofjoe | 2 comments | 11 Apr 25 14:01 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
megaman821 ◴[11 Apr 25 15:14 UTC] No.43654757[source]▶
As a lurker on both Bluesky and Twitter, I find Bluesky is a much more hostile place. Twitter is much more absurd but there is not as much anger.
replies(25): >>43654879 #>>43654911 #>>43654964 #>>43654978 #>>43654981 #>>43655179 #>>43658062 #>>43658076 #>>43658200 #>>43658690 #>>43659029 #>>43659158 #>>43659250 #>>43659251 #>>43659639 #>>43659684 #>>43659724 #>>43659908 #>>43660101 #>>43660296 #>>43660933 #>>43661119 #>>43665491 #>>43667438 #>>43667522 #
Molitor5901 ◴[11 Apr 25 15:46 UTC] No.43655179[source]▶
I'm pretty left leaning and I don't like Bluesky. For me, it's too hostile and too much of an angry echo chamber. X is scattered wildly but I with muting I have been able to shape to get a more reasonable feed.
replies(8): >>43655251 #>>43657988 #>>43658077 #>>43658450 #>>43659445 #>>43659596 #>>43660179 #>>43663891 #
jghn ◴[11 Apr 25 20:55 UTC] No.43658450[source]▶
I don't understand why people struggle with either site. Follow only people you want to see. Both sites allow you to only see posts from those accounts. Problem solved.
replies(3): >>43658542 #>>43658647 #>>43659568 #
spiderice ◴[11 Apr 25 21:03 UTC] No.43658542[source]▶
Unless you want to follow Adobe, who were just driven out by a mob of angry people
replies(2): >>43658588 #>>43660010 #
1. jghn ◴[11 Apr 25 21:08 UTC] No.43658588[source]▶
There are a lot of people I'd love to see content from on all of the platforms who aren't where I want them to be, for a variety of reasons. That's not really a great argument.
replies(1): >>43660181 #
2. jacobgkau ◴[12 Apr 25 00:29 UTC] No.43660181[source]▶
The argument is that this is now part of that list of reasons. Why acknowledge a problem but disregard one of the causes?