←back to thread

170 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
slibhb ◴[] No.43644865[source]
LLMs are statistical models trained on human-generated text. They aren't the perfectly logical "machine brains" that Asimov and others imagined.

The upshot of this is that LLMs are quite good at the stuff that he thinks only humans will be able to do. What they aren't so good at (yet) is really rigorous reasoning, exactly the opposite of what 20th century people assumed.

replies(5): >>43645899 #>>43646817 #>>43647147 #>>43647395 #>>43650058 #
beloch ◴[] No.43646817[source]
What we used to think of as "AI" at one point in time becomes a mere "algorithm" or "automation" by another point in time. A lot of what Asimov predicted has come to pass, very much in the way he saw it. We just no longer think of it as "AI".

LLM's are just the latest form of "AI" that, for a change, doesn't quite fit Asimov's mold. Perhaps it's because they're being designed to replace humans in creative tasks rather than liberate humans to pursue them.

replies(2): >>43647847 #>>43648825 #
israrkhan ◴[] No.43647847[source]
Exactly... as someone said " I need AI to do my laundary and dishes, while I can focus on art and creative stuff" ... But AI is doing the exact opposite, i.e creative stuff (drawing, poetry, coding, documents creation etc), while we are left to do the dishes/laundary.
replies(4): >>43648114 #>>43648246 #>>43649501 #>>43653897 #
schwartzworld ◴[] No.43653897[source]
We thought machines were gonna do the work so we could pursue art and music. Instead of machines get to make the art and music, while humans work in the Amazon warehouses.
replies(1): >>43653945 #
1. aaronbaugher ◴[] No.43653945{3}[source]
It was kind of funny to see the shift in the media reaction when they realized the new batch of machines are better at replacing writers than at replacing truckers.