←back to thread

170 points bookofjoe | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.4s | source
Show context
chuckadams ◴[] No.43644704[source]
It certainly is liberating all our creative works from our possession...
replies(5): >>43644787 #>>43644796 #>>43644830 #>>43644838 #>>43644929 #
vonneumannstan ◴[] No.43644787[source]
Intellectual Property is a questionable idea to begin with...
replies(7): >>43644934 #>>43644949 #>>43645069 #>>43646250 #>>43646372 #>>43646389 #>>43647327 #
chuckadams ◴[] No.43645069[source]
It's not the loss of ownership I'm lamenting, it's the loss of production by humans in the first place.
replies(2): >>43645178 #>>43645355 #
vonneumannstan ◴[] No.43645355[source]
People made the same argument about Cameras vs Painting. "Humans are no longer creating the art!"

But I doubt most people would subscribe to that view now and would say Photography is an entirely new art form.

replies(4): >>43646461 #>>43646853 #>>43649298 #>>43651181 #
1. chuckadams ◴[] No.43649298[source]
A human is still involved with the camera. Just a different set of skills, and absent manipulation in post, the things being photographed tended to actually exist. Now we need neither photographer nor subject.
replies(1): >>43654855 #
2. vonneumannstan ◴[] No.43654855[source]
AIs still aren't autonomous. The model doesn't make anything unless a human directs it to. It's just another layer of abstraction above the camera or paintbrush.