←back to thread

170 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chuckadams ◴[] No.43644704[source]
It certainly is liberating all our creative works from our possession...
replies(5): >>43644787 #>>43644796 #>>43644830 #>>43644838 #>>43644929 #
vonneumannstan ◴[] No.43644787[source]
Intellectual Property is a questionable idea to begin with...
replies(7): >>43644934 #>>43644949 #>>43645069 #>>43646250 #>>43646372 #>>43646389 #>>43647327 #
chuckadams ◴[] No.43645069[source]
It's not the loss of ownership I'm lamenting, it's the loss of production by humans in the first place.
replies(2): >>43645178 #>>43645355 #
vonneumannstan ◴[] No.43645355[source]
People made the same argument about Cameras vs Painting. "Humans are no longer creating the art!"

But I doubt most people would subscribe to that view now and would say Photography is an entirely new art form.

replies(4): >>43646461 #>>43646853 #>>43649298 #>>43651181 #
pesus ◴[] No.43646853[source]
Using generative AI is a lot closer to hiring a photographer and telling them to take pictures for you than taking the pictures themselves.
replies(1): >>43647182 #
wubrr ◴[] No.43647182[source]
I mean, you still have the option of taking pictures yourself, if you find that creative and rewarding...
replies(1): >>43647378 #
pesus ◴[] No.43647378[source]
Absolutely, but it still doesn't make hiring a photographer an art form.
replies(2): >>43647569 #>>43647597 #
thrwthsnw ◴[] No.43647597[source]
Why do we give awards to Directors then?
replies(2): >>43648180 #>>43648193 #
1. MattGrommes ◴[] No.43648193{6}[source]
This is nit-picky but you're probably actually referring to Cinematographers, or Directors of Photography. They're the ones who deal with the actual cameras, lens, use of light, etc. Directors deal with the actors and the script/writer.

The reason we give them awards is that the camera can't tell you which lens will give you the effect you want or how to emphasize certain emotions with light.