←back to thread

Isaac Asimov describes how AI will liberate humans and their creativity (1992)

(www.openculture.com)
170 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | 10 Apr 25 14:30 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
chuckadams ◴[10 Apr 25 15:15 UTC] No.43644704[source]▶
It certainly is liberating all our creative works from our possession...
replies(5): >>43644787 #>>43644796 #>>43644830 #>>43644838 #>>43644929 #
vonneumannstan ◴[10 Apr 25 15:20 UTC] No.43644787[source]▶
Intellectual Property is a questionable idea to begin with...
replies(7): >>43644934 #>>43644949 #>>43645069 #>>43646250 #>>43646372 #>>43646389 #>>43647327 #
chuckadams ◴[10 Apr 25 15:43 UTC] No.43645069[source]▶
It's not the loss of ownership I'm lamenting, it's the loss of production by humans in the first place.
replies(2): >>43645178 #>>43645355 #
vonneumannstan ◴[10 Apr 25 16:11 UTC] No.43645355[source]▶
People made the same argument about Cameras vs Painting. "Humans are no longer creating the art!"

But I doubt most people would subscribe to that view now and would say Photography is an entirely new art form.

replies(4): >>43646461 #>>43646853 #>>43649298 #>>43651181 #
pesus ◴[10 Apr 25 18:36 UTC] No.43646853[source]▶
Using generative AI is a lot closer to hiring a photographer and telling them to take pictures for you than taking the pictures themselves.
replies(1): >>43647182 #
wubrr ◴[10 Apr 25 19:18 UTC] No.43647182[source]▶
I mean, you still have the option of taking pictures yourself, if you find that creative and rewarding...
replies(1): >>43647378 #
pesus ◴[10 Apr 25 19:42 UTC] No.43647378[source]▶
Absolutely, but it still doesn't make hiring a photographer an art form.
replies(2): >>43647569 #>>43647597 #
1. wubrr ◴[10 Apr 25 20:05 UTC] No.43647569[source]▶
How do you define 'art form'? Anything can arguably be an art form.