←back to thread

170 points bookofjoe | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
janalsncm ◴[] No.43646748[source]
> Isaac Asimov describes artificial intelligence as “a phrase that we use for any device that does things which, in the past, we have associated only with human intelligence.”

This is a pretty good definition, honestly. It explains the AI Effect quite well: calculators aren’t “AI” because it’s been a while since humans were the only ones who could do arithmetic. At one point they were, though.

replies(2): >>43646765 #>>43647350 #
1. azinman2 ◴[] No.43646765[source]
Although calculators can now do things almost no humans can do, or at least in any reasonable time. But most (now) wouldn’t call it AI. It’s a tool, with a very limited domain
replies(1): >>43646878 #
2. janalsncm ◴[] No.43646878[source]
That’s my point, it’s not AI now. It used to be.
replies(1): >>43647290 #
3. hinkley ◴[] No.43647290[source]
Similarly, we esteem performance optimizations so aggressively that a lot of things that used to be called performance work are now called architecture, good design. We just keep moving the goal posts to make things more comfortable.