←back to thread

170 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.224s | source
Show context
chuckadams ◴[] No.43644704[source]
It certainly is liberating all our creative works from our possession...
replies(5): >>43644787 #>>43644796 #>>43644830 #>>43644838 #>>43644929 #
vonneumannstan ◴[] No.43644787[source]
Intellectual Property is a questionable idea to begin with...
replies(7): >>43644934 #>>43644949 #>>43645069 #>>43646250 #>>43646372 #>>43646389 #>>43647327 #
chuckadams ◴[] No.43645069[source]
It's not the loss of ownership I'm lamenting, it's the loss of production by humans in the first place.
replies(2): >>43645178 #>>43645355 #
vonneumannstan ◴[] No.43645355[source]
People made the same argument about Cameras vs Painting. "Humans are no longer creating the art!"

But I doubt most people would subscribe to that view now and would say Photography is an entirely new art form.

replies(4): >>43646461 #>>43646853 #>>43649298 #>>43651181 #
1. NitpickLawyer ◴[] No.43646461[source]
> People made the same argument about Cameras vs Painting.

I remember that from a couple of years ago, when Stable Diffusion came out. There was a lot of talk about "art" and "AI" and someone posted a collection of articles / interviews / opinion pieces about this exact same thing - painting vs. cameras.