←back to thread

170 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.311s | source
Show context
kogus ◴[] No.43644640[source]
I think we need to consider what the end goal of technology is at a very broad level.

Asimov says in this that there are things computers will be good at, and things humans will be good at. By embracing that complementary relationship, we can advance as a society and be free to do the things that only humans can do.

That is definitely how I wish things were going. But it's becoming clear that within a few more years, computers will be far better at absolutely everything than human beings could ever be. We are not far even now from a prompt accepting a request such as "Write a another volume of the Foundation series, in the style of Isaac Asimov", and getting a complete novel that does not need editing, does not need review, and is equal to or better than the quality of the original novels.

When that goal is achieved, what then are humans "for"? Humans need purpose, and we are going to be in a position where we don't serve any purpose. I am worried about what will become of us after we have made ourselves obsolete.

replies(12): >>43644692 #>>43644695 #>>43644736 #>>43644771 #>>43644824 #>>43644846 #>>43644847 #>>43644881 #>>43644933 #>>43645048 #>>43646501 #>>43647117 #
1. jillesvangurp ◴[] No.43644846[source]
Evolution is not about being better / winning but about adapting. People will adapt and co-exist. Some better than others.

AIs aren't really part of the whole evolutionary race for survival so far. We create them. And we allow them to run. And then we shut them down. Maybe there will be some AI enhanced people that start doing better. And maybe the people bit become optional at some point. At that point you might argue we've just morphed/evolved into whatever that is.