←back to thread

150 points pmags | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
1. seydor ◴[] No.43643412[source]
what I don't understand is why post-globalization has been equated with deglobalization
replies(2): >>43643468 #>>43644114 #
2. zweifuss ◴[] No.43643468[source]
Possibly because of the Cold War experience. Also because globalisation is slowing down and we see some reshoreing already.
3. sorcerer-mar ◴[] No.43644114[source]
Can you articulate the difference? This is the first I've heard the term "post-globalization."
replies(1): >>43646649 #
4. AlecSchueler ◴[] No.43646649[source]
Post-globalisation is whatever comes after the globalisation period. It's a chapter of the history books still being written and as such can still take many forms, of which scaling back on globalisation is one.
replies(1): >>43647026 #
5. sorcerer-mar ◴[] No.43647026{3}[source]
And what are some of the others that are "moving away from globalization but not scaling back on it?"
replies(1): >>43684495 #
6. AlecSchueler ◴[] No.43684495{4}[source]
Moving past, not moving away. Hyper-globalisation could be an example of post-globalisation as well.