←back to thread

689 points taubek | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.402s | source
Show context
JSR_FDED ◴[] No.43631980[source]
It’s like people excited about the new datacenter being built in their town, think of all the jobs that will bring they cry. Nobody realizes it takes 6 people to run a datacenter.

Bringing “manufacturing back to the US” is a fool’s errand. The future of manufacturing is automation, not jobs.

replies(14): >>43632283 #>>43632300 #>>43632333 #>>43632356 #>>43632390 #>>43632872 #>>43632937 #>>43633742 #>>43634455 #>>43634730 #>>43635013 #>>43636738 #>>43636871 #>>43645775 #
xienze ◴[] No.43632300[source]
I think you're missing that the bigger value is having the manufacturing on your home soil instead of depending on being in the good graces of China.
replies(5): >>43632376 #>>43632414 #>>43632738 #>>43632894 #>>43633981 #
vidarh ◴[] No.43632376[source]
Forcing China to become more independent of exports to the US also means China will care less about being in the good graces of the US. It cuts both ways.
replies(3): >>43632397 #>>43632552 #>>43633027 #
1. NoMoreNicksLeft ◴[] No.43632552[source]
One could easily have the impression that despite this, China has never really given a rat's ass about being in the good graces of the US, and that when they do relent it is often the case that they do not do so in good faith at all. If they comply with ethics and human rights, it's to the absolute minimum of that and in an underhanded way designed to undermine, but often not even that and they're just cheating and good at hiding it.

In other words, not much would be lost except the devious lip service.

replies(2): >>43634277 #>>43644644 #
2. vidarh ◴[] No.43644644[source]
It depends on what you're looking at. They've avoided a confrontation with Taiwan, for example. How long that will last if/when they no longer consider open conflict with the US to be a major consideration is anyones guess.