←back to thread

177 points belter | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bluescrn ◴[] No.43623756[source]
Unstoppable force meets 104% tariff...
replies(4): >>43623816 #>>43624173 #>>43624269 #>>43626416 #
blitzar ◴[] No.43626416[source]
95% of the world doesn't live in America, all the more for the rest of us. America can enjoy its beautiful coal.
replies(1): >>43626929 #
jiggawatts ◴[] No.43626929[source]
I just got a flashback to Trump enunciating “Clean coal, beautiful clean coal!”
replies(1): >>43630183 #
ZeroGravitas ◴[] No.43630183{3}[source]
Almost exactly as you were making this comment he signed a bunch of stuff to "Reinvigorates America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Industry":

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-pr...

replies(2): >>43630325 #>>43631418 #
1. jiggawatts ◴[] No.43630325{4}[source]
And then he’s going to extort trading partners like the EU by essentially forcing them to buy polluting coal from the US or face ongoing sanctions.
replies(1): >>43631440 #
2. rsynnott ◴[] No.43631440[source]
This is what he's talking about, but... it doesn't make any sense, at all. What would "forcing the EU to buy coal" entail? The EU isn't a command economy and has no potential use for coal _itself_. The EU contains companies which require coal (albeit demand has been dropping for some time) but they're just going to buy whatever's cheapest, and particularly given it's _coal_, and has a very low value per tonne, that's generally more or less going to mean whatever's closest. Unless American coal was _radically_ cheaper than any other coal, it would be hard to cover the extra transport cost.