←back to thread

655 points louis-paul | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
geenat ◴[] No.43624362[source]
IMHO they should be a good steward and toss the Wireguard guy a mil considering Tailscale is pretty much Wireguard with a GUI on top.
replies(5): >>43624486 #>>43624493 #>>43624614 #>>43624907 #>>43626644 #
aborsy ◴[] No.43624493[source]
This is not correct. Wireguard establishes a tunnel between peer A and B, and its simplicity stops there. Tailscale does tons of complex networking, filtering, nat traversal, DNS, file sharing, etc. Wireguard is a small part of the codebase today, which has grown a lot.

It’s a bit like saying Dropbox is just a GUI on top of TLS.

replies(4): >>43624594 #>>43624613 #>>43624623 #>>43624826 #
aqfamnzc ◴[] No.43624623[source]
> It’s a bit like saying Dropbox is just a GUI on top of TLS.

Well, it is. After all, for a Linux user, you can already build such a system yourself quite trivially...

replies(3): >>43624752 #>>43624929 #>>43625339 #
eddieroger ◴[] No.43624752[source]
It'll be a sad day when this reference is posted and understood for the last time.
replies(3): >>43624995 #>>43625020 #>>43625205 #
swyx ◴[] No.43625020{3}[source]
a fun thought exercise - what would have to happen to HN for this to come true? basically all the old guard have to age out and not pass on the reference?
replies(1): >>43625061 #
dmit ◴[] No.43625061{4}[source]
Ea-Nasir

Us humans are kinda ok at preserving knowledge (and we're getting even better, but not in a good way).

replies(1): >>43625646 #
1. swyx ◴[] No.43625646{5}[source]
brb destroying some magnetic tapes because i can just put them on the cloud