←back to thread

170 points flanked-evergl | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
amelius ◴[] No.43619760[source]
I don't understand people who want to defend Apple in this case. UK is a functioning democracy, and why would you want to put a (foreign) company above that? If you want change, you know the route ...
replies(8): >>43619777 #>>43619778 #>>43619785 #>>43619790 #>>43619794 #>>43619795 #>>43619821 #>>43619952 #
ohgr ◴[] No.43619794[source]
I think you vastly misunderstand or are oversimplifying the problem here. They actually spoke up against a government mandated privacy violation.

What I am worried about really is Google, Meta etc did not speak up against it and likely have had the same requests. So I am worried about some foreign companies complying with my government. And very surprised that one particular foreign company gives more of a shit about me as an end user than my own government.

replies(1): >>43620219 #
petepete ◴[] No.43620219[source]
I don't think it's fair to tar Meta with that brush. WhatApp have said repeatedly they'll leave the UK before disabling E2EE.
replies(1): >>43620939 #
1. ohgr ◴[] No.43620939[source]
I don't believe they've commented on this issue at all and they carry more messages than Apple do in the UK.
replies(1): >>43629803 #
2. petepete ◴[] No.43629803[source]
Not in the last couple of months but they made a big deal about refusing to comply when it was raised in 2023.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/mar/09/whatsapp-...