←back to thread

27 points apollinaire | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
ggm ◴[] No.43576657[source]
So let's be clear: it's implicitly incest, right? One denial in this article aside, he appears to have encouraged if not caused his younger sisters eroticism as a pre teen, took her away to share a room in the hotel his parents honeymooned in, changed his art after entering a relationship. Nobody knows who the child's father is, fair enough. His pre marriage art was unquestionably "edgy"

Amazing paintings. Also, amazingly disturbing. I cannot conceive of having one on the wall.

replies(4): >>43611317 #>>43611912 #>>43612477 #>>43613375 #
hiddencost ◴[] No.43611912[source]
It's very stark, touring a gallery show of Schiele.

Every single piece is grotesque except that work portraying his sister.

replies(2): >>43612737 #>>43612746 #
1. ◴[] No.43612737[source]