3 points apollinaire | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.426s | source
1. ggm ◴[] No.43576620[source]

https://archive.is/ES7M3

2. ggm ◴[] No.43576657[source]

So let's be clear: it's implicitly incest, right? One denial in this article aside, he appears to have encouraged if not caused his younger sisters eroticism as a pre teen, took her away to share a room in the hotel his parents honeymooned in, changed his art after entering a relationship. Nobody knows who the child's father is, fair enough. His pre marriage art was unquestionably "edgy"

Amazing paintings. Also, amazingly disturbing. I cannot conceive of having one on the wall.