←back to thread

US labour watchdog halts Apple cases after group’s lawyer picked for top job

(www.ft.com)
275 points belter | 2 comments | 02 Apr 25 11:50 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
duxup ◴[04 Apr 25 13:22 UTC] No.43581973[source]▶
It feels like every pick of this administration is just someone who has a motivation for corruption.
replies(6): >>43582200 #>>43582614 #>>43583303 #>>43583574 #>>43583968 #>>43584245 #
nine_zeros[dead post] ◴[04 Apr 25 13:38 UTC] No.43582200[source]▶
[flagged]
wodenokoto ◴[04 Apr 25 14:44 UTC] No.43583174[source]▶
> Seriously, what does one really expect from an unethical convicted criminal?

I expected a repeat of his first term. Which honestly was quite uneventful. This is not.

replies(9): >>43583203 #>>43583206 #>>43583240 #>>43583264 #>>43583472 #>>43583566 #>>43584032 #>>43584084 #>>43584729 #
jjulius ◴[04 Apr 25 14:50 UTC] No.43583264[source]▶
>I expected a repeat of his first term. Which honestly was quite uneventful. This is not.

They were quite candid with their intent. Aside from him casually/flippantly brushing off Project 2025 during his campaign (when it was clear that his campaign was deeply connected to it), it was tremendously obvious to anybody paying attention that things would be much different during round two, and in a more aggressive manner.

You had your head in the sand. If you voted for him, this is your fault. Damn you.

Downvotes be damned.

replies(1): >>43583323 #
robertlagrant ◴[04 Apr 25 14:54 UTC] No.43583323[source]▶
> Downvotes be damned.

What's the point of phrasing this as though you're off to the gallows for your beliefs? It's an internet forum.

replies(1): >>43583335 #
1. jjulius ◴[04 Apr 25 14:54 UTC] No.43583335[source]▶
Just a simple acknowledgement that I am aware that my comment is unconstructive and goes against the desire/rules of this space. If I'm going to be an asshole, I usually try and acknowledge that I'm aware of it.
replies(1): >>43584229 #
2. matwood ◴[04 Apr 25 15:55 UTC] No.43584229[source]▶
> comment is unconstructive

I understand. It's hard to be constructive when it was so blatantly clear a second term was going to be a disaster of epic proportions and here we are.