←back to thread

305 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
whytevuhuni ◴[] No.43568876[source]
They’re not saints, especially with the games distribution platform monopoly they’re sitting on top of, but...

I really think Valve have become the de-facto owners of the “don’t be evil” motto nowadays, even if they don’t advertise themselves as such.

replies(14): >>43568921 #>>43568924 #>>43568926 #>>43568927 #>>43568949 #>>43569035 #>>43569159 #>>43569479 #>>43569549 #>>43569590 #>>43569701 #>>43569787 #>>43572614 #>>43579674 #
giancarlostoro ◴[] No.43569035[source]
I find it funny that every time other publishers try to recreate Steam with their own catalogues, a good chunk of gamers (myself included) just refuse to buy "exclusives" on other platforms, to the point they eventually crawl back to Steam. EA held out for a LONG time. I broke my reluctance only once because I wanted to play the latest FarCry game, but otherwise, I've kept all my games on Steam. They eventually caved too.

What's also interesting is some games will unlock for you if you buy them from their own stores, like the Elder Scrolls Online MMO will unlock on Steam for you if you just link your Steam account.

My only annoyance with them is with Valve for not making new games / franchises. They clearly have a good talent pool, but they're so much slower than Nintendo it feels like in this regard. They're finally adding a new game, but its just a Team Fortress spiritual successor.

replies(2): >>43569155 #>>43569531 #
1. johnnyanmac ◴[] No.43569531[source]
In some ways, it's because valve caved and did the equivalent of tax cuts for the rich. You have revenue more than like, 25 million/yr as a publisher and you reduce your infamous 30% cut to 20%.

Im sure at thst point it's more worth considering.