←back to thread

190 points psxuaw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
asveikau ◴[] No.43536779[source]
ZFS is probably the biggest reason for me. I have a machine with a zfs pool running samba and nfsd.

Philosophically I tend to prefer *BSDs over Linux. I have a few FreeBSD machines, one OpenBSD, and one Linux.

replies(4): >>43537356 #>>43537463 #>>43540789 #>>43541102 #
0x457 ◴[] No.43537356[source]
> ZFS is probably the biggest reason for me.

Maybe in the past there was an argument for that, but ever since FreeBSD started using OpenZFS implementation...what's the difference?

My ideal OS would be something like NixOS, but on FreeBSD and with better language than Nix.

replies(4): >>43539675 #>>43539695 #>>43543266 #>>43548345 #
bluGill ◴[] No.43539695[source]
ZFS is a first class part of FreeBSD. you can use it on linux, but it will always have some rough edges. How rough it open to question though, for some it works well.
replies(2): >>43540514 #>>43540561 #
tomxor ◴[] No.43540561[source]
Used ZFS on Debian in production for 8 years, yet to experience rough edges but always interested to learn.
replies(4): >>43540716 #>>43541720 #>>43542536 #>>43574855 #
turtledragonfly ◴[] No.43540716[source]
Do you use ZFS for root, on Debian? (enabling "boot environments")

I've recently switched my FreeBSD setups to use that scheme, and it's been nice. Would be interested to hear if it's similarly straightforward on Debian (my second-favorite OS :)

Obviously requires support in the bootcode; I'm not sure of the state of that for Linux.

replies(3): >>43540870 #>>43541407 #>>43542038 #
1. free652 ◴[] No.43542038[source]
zfsbootmenu https://docs.zfsbootmenu.org/en/v3.0.x/

Also nice way to recover zfs if anything goes wrong. yea, it's a linux image for just booting. But you put it as an EFI image, and works great.