←back to thread

Why I run FreeBSD for my home servers (2024)

(aumont.fr)
185 points psxuaw | 1 comments | 31 Mar 25 12:59 UTC | HN request time: 0.34s | source
Show context
lunarlull ◴[31 Mar 25 17:10 UTC] No.43537296[source]▶
Alpine, Void, Devuan or Artix all would have allowed author to use Linux while addressing his points of concern. I don't think the BSD's have real advantages anymore since so much core performance stuff is in Linux first. When most of the software is available on all these platforms, it mostly comes down to user preference.
replies(3): >>43537375 #>>43537486 #>>43542522 #
quesera ◴[31 Mar 25 17:26 UTC] No.43537486[source]▶
I run Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and SmartOS/illumos in various capacities personal and professional.

Each has its own strengths, but I choose FreeBSD for home servers (shared file/media server. and network gateway), for a few specific reasons:

  - ZFS (on root, fully integrated tooling for jails, etc)
  - More consistency/less churn in base system (great for set-and-forget systems)
  - Ports/pkg (still better than any Linux pkg manager)
replies(2): >>43538732 #>>43538857 #
1. E39M5S62 ◴[31 Mar 25 19:21 UTC] No.43538732[source]▶
Can you enumerate why ports/pkg is better than any package manager on Linux?