←back to thread

190 points psxuaw | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.048s | source | bottom
Show context
carlhjerpe ◴[] No.43537418[source]
I started reading but stopped as soon as it was a systemd rant. systemd, while not for everyone is a good for most people.
replies(4): >>43537453 #>>43542701 #>>43544869 #>>43546174 #
1. cf100clunk ◴[] No.43537453[source]
I kept on reading because I use OSes that have different init systems, one of which is systemd. Choice is great. Of course, your comment could be accused of being a rant too.
replies(2): >>43537716 #>>43542221 #
2. carlhjerpe ◴[] No.43537716[source]
Choice is great, but I don't think we can expect everyone to maintain "unit files" for every init system. If you can and can afford to run systemd it's probably worth it, it's a "nice to have" most of the time.

If you wanna run your own init solution you can but it might be a bit of effort, embedded people often do this while a system like a desktop with dbus and display servers and IPC left and right might standardize on systemd

3. bitwize ◴[] No.43542221[source]
Choice is fine, but the perception is that "the science is settled" and systemd is objectively better; therefore if you are still a systemd refusenik you're a little bit crazy and more difficult to take seriously.
replies(1): >>43547202 #
4. cf100clunk ◴[] No.43547202[source]
It is not sensible to base critical technical choices upon the whims of others.
replies(1): >>43548211 #
5. bitwize ◴[] No.43548211{3}[source]
It's not but it still happens. Network effects and social proof are powerful, even amongst Linux users who consider themselves "technical".
replies(1): >>43548954 #
6. cf100clunk ◴[] No.43548954{4}[source]
I don't get your point, at all. I tried.