←back to thread

160 points areoform | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
ranger_danger ◴[] No.43519896[source]
> She was disappeared without due process or explanation

Then how do you know it was only because of an op-ed?

replies(6): >>43519920 #>>43519991 #>>43520084 #>>43520120 #>>43520142 #>>43520464 #
deckar01 ◴[] No.43520142[source]
> Friends and colleagues of Ms Öztürk said she was not closely involved in pro-Palestinian protests that broke out on campuses last spring. They said her only activism was co-authoring the Tufts op-ed.

https://amp.abc.net.au/article/105107664

replies(1): >>43520169 #
threeseed ◴[] No.43520169[source]
Even if she was involved in protests the Constitution applies to non-citizens as well.

She has the right to protest provided she has committed no crime.

replies(2): >>43522908 #>>43524273 #
omnimus ◴[] No.43522908[source]
You can only protest the things that will not make it a crime. Protesting criminally is a crime.
replies(1): >>43522979 #
brandensilva ◴[] No.43522979[source]
Writing differing views is not a crime. Still, even if what she did was somehow illegal or they had a legimate legal reason to revoke her visa she deserves to be able to face her accuser and not be abducted and denied her life, liberty and property without due process.
replies(1): >>43526316 #
1. omnimus ◴[] No.43526316[source]
Sorry it wasnt clear but that was my attempt at pure sarcasm.

I thought the situation is absolutely nonsensical. Being able to disagree with anyone is part of our social fabric. Once you ban that then wild stuff starts to happen.