Trump's Police Are Now Disappearing Students for Their Op-Eds

(www.techdirt.com)

Show context

ranger_danger ◴[30 Mar 25 00:08 UTC] No.43519896[source]▶

>>43519864 (OP) #

> She was disappeared without due process or explanation

Then how do you know it was only because of an op-ed?

replies(6): >>43519920 #>>43519991 #>>43520084 #>>43520120 #>>43520142 #>>43520464 #

deckar01 ◴[30 Mar 25 00:52 UTC] No.43520142[source]▶

>>43519896 #

> Friends and colleagues of Ms Öztürk said she was not closely involved in pro-Palestinian protests that broke out on campuses last spring. They said her only activism was co-authoring the Tufts op-ed.

https://amp.abc.net.au/article/105107664

replies(1): >>43520169 #

threeseed ◴[30 Mar 25 00:55 UTC] No.43520169[source]▶

>>43520142 #

Even if she was involved in protests the Constitution applies to non-citizens as well.

She has the right to protest provided she has committed no crime.

replies(2): >>43522908 #>>43524273 #

1. ranger_danger ◴[30 Mar 25 14:00 UTC] No.43524273{3}[source]▶

>>43520169 #

I believe the terms of student visas could technically prohibit protesting for things unrelated to your field of study, if a judge decided to interpret it that way.

replies(1): >>43537818 #

2. AlecSchueler ◴[31 Mar 25 17:59 UTC] No.43537818[source]▶

>>43524273 (TP) #

Surely constitutional rights take priority?

replies(1): >>43538010 #

3. ranger_danger ◴[31 Mar 25 18:19 UTC] No.43538010[source]▶

>>43537818 #

Except violating the conditions of your visa would be a crime, no matter how free your speech is. And the First Amendment is about criticizing the US Government, not Israel.

replies(1): >>43538984 #

4. AlecSchueler ◴[31 Mar 25 19:41 UTC] No.43538984{3}[source]▶

>>43538010 #

The first amendment is about freedom of speech, not about criticising either the US or Israeli government. I don't believe that one can agree to waiver their constitutional rights so I'm not sure those visa conditions would be legal.

replies(1): >>43539143 #

5. ranger_danger ◴[31 Mar 25 19:55 UTC] No.43539143{4}[source]▶

>>43538984 #

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/

> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition *the Government* for a redress of grievances.

replies(1): >>43539223 #

6. AlecSchueler ◴[31 Mar 25 20:01 UTC] No.43539223{5}[source]▶

>>43539143 #

> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging *the freedom of speech, or of the press;* or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

↑