←back to thread

595 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
marginalia_nu ◴[] No.43505551[source]
My general takes (as someone who also has a somewhat popular blog) is that

The inverted pyramid is almost always the correct format for your text. I often put the tweet-length version of the post in the title or first paragraph. Get to the point quickly, then elaborate. Means you can bail out at any point of the text and still take home most of what mattered, while the meticulous crowd can have their nitpicks addressed toward the end.

The problem of finding an audience is best solved by being really transparent about what you're about. Inverted pyramid solves that. There's no point to drawing in people who aren't going to be interested. Retaining existing readers beats capturing new readers.

I'm less bullish on images, unless they are profoundly relevant to the text. Illustrations for the sake of having illustrations are no bueno in my opinion. You want to reduce distractions and visual noise. Images should above all never be funny.

replies(15): >>43505573 #>>43505719 #>>43506046 #>>43506189 #>>43506400 #>>43506970 #>>43507372 #>>43507727 #>>43508468 #>>43508865 #>>43508960 #>>43513506 #>>43514694 #>>43515583 #>>43516620 #
mvkel ◴[] No.43506046[source]
This works for blog posts, certainly. But it falls apart if you're doing anything even slightly long form, or have multiple points to make.

It's also why LinkedIn posts all sound the same.

"It seemed like any other Monday. Little did I know, it was going to be the day that changed my life forever..."

"Marketing isn't about getting the most traffic. It's about converting the most traffic. A thread:"

replies(3): >>43506575 #>>43507703 #>>43508866 #
yesfitz ◴[] No.43506575[source]
Why do you think the inverted pyramid doesn't work for longer form?

If you have multiple points that don't both support a larger point, they should probably be split into two separate essays.

Your first example could be the start of an inverted pyramid if the thesis of the post is how the Monday was just like any other. But the next sentence dashes that notion.

The second example could be an example if it quickly follows up with the ways to convert traffic, but better to lead with the novel way(s) to convert traffic, then follow up with why conversion is more important than generation.

replies(2): >>43507597 #>>43516533 #
1. mvkel ◴[] No.43516533[source]
To me it just gets repetitive. After the first one, my brain recognizes the pattern. If chapter 1 starts with a bang, then fills in the blanks, then chapter 2 is structured in the exact same way, it feels formulaic; not good writing