←back to thread

275 points testrun | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
v3ss0n ◴[] No.43504126[source]
I am Myanmar and reporting from Bangkok.

I was upstairs, at third floor and was going down to have lunch and it shook whole house. At first I thought I am having nausea due to not having any food yet then thing starts to shake violently almost knocked me off stairs . And glasses started to rumble.

A construction in Pathunam collapsed.

Some house of friends of mine in Mandalay - Myanmar collapsed. One girl managed to get out in time.

One construction in Mandalay collapsed - 2 died.

Historic Mandalay Palace wall and entrance collapsed .

Airport in naypyitaw collapsed, there are report of many airport workers died.

Bridges collapsed, one of the longest standing historic bridges of Myanmar - Sagaing Bridge collapsed.

One other bridge in Mandalay brings down two cars with it, casualties unknown.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18bsATAEKS/

Many Junta gov buildings collapsed

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BYV644DmY/

replies(10): >>43504251 #>>43504292 #>>43504298 #>>43504317 #>>43504890 #>>43504908 #>>43505150 #>>43507149 #>>43508689 #>>43529195 #
baq ◴[] No.43504251[source]
shakemap: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000pn9s...

Mandalay looks to be almost exactly in the center of the worst of it...

replies(4): >>43504820 #>>43505074 #>>43507586 #>>43508223 #
brenainn ◴[] No.43505074[source]
and PAGER: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000pn9s...
replies(1): >>43505406 #
baq ◴[] No.43505406{3}[source]
> Estimated economic losses are 6-70% GDP of Burma.

6-70% holy crap what a range.

replies(1): >>43506013 #
simonebrunozzi ◴[] No.43506013{4}[source]
Probably meant 60-70%
replies(4): >>43506172 #>>43506609 #>>43506770 #>>43507746 #
sph ◴[] No.43506609{5}[source]
60-70% loss in GDP would mean the literal end of the country, it's a ludicrously large figure no one could ever rebuild from. This is a 7.7 earthquake; it probably is 6–7% GBP which is still significant.
replies(4): >>43506764 #>>43507308 #>>43507367 #>>43611151 #
jeffbee ◴[] No.43507308{6}[source]
60% loss can be recouped by 10 years of compounding 5% growth.
replies(3): >>43507419 #>>43507491 #>>43511520 #
sph ◴[] No.43511520{7}[source]
60% loss in GDP is roughly 60% loss in population. You don't recoup citizens in 10 years with 5% growth.
replies(1): >>43512436 #
jeffbee ◴[] No.43512436{8}[source]
You're suggesting this earthquake killed thirty million people?
replies(1): >>43515802 #
1. sph ◴[] No.43515802{9}[source]
No i'm suggesting that the earthquake didn't kill that many people, so it cannot have lost 60% GDP which makes no sense whatsoever.