←back to thread

1009 points n1b0m | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.616s | source
Show context
Swoerd123[dead post] ◴[] No.43411056[source]
[flagged]
Zambyte ◴[] No.43411102[source]
What was wrong with Harris?
replies(12): >>43411121 #>>43411128 #>>43411133 #>>43411146 #>>43411203 #>>43411223 #>>43411248 #>>43411296 #>>43411442 #>>43411552 #>>43411640 #>>43412970 #
mandmandam ◴[] No.43411223[source]
All Harris had to do to win was promise to stop sending arms to Israel.

Many, many polls showed this very clearly. 77% of Democrat voters wanted an arms embargo, and over 30% of 2020 Biden voters in key battleground states said that this issue was serious enough to affect their vote.

> A Harris organizer who worked on youth turnout said that senior campaign officials gave them an order: When they sent out mass volunteer or fundraising emails and people replied by asking about Gaza, they were told to mark it as “no response.” The result? They seldom ended up engaging with voters on that issue.

- https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/uncommitted-le...

So yeah, if there was one thing wrong with Harris, that would be it. That one issue would have changed the result, and as far as single issues go, I call genocide a pretty big one. It's kinda the biggest.

Far from the only issue though - campaigning with Dick Cheney was pretty fucking stupid, for one thing. Then there was promising to be harsher on immigration than Trump. Promising the world's "most lethal" military (we already are?) while trying to gaslight broke Americans into believing the economy was great. In general, trying to pick up right wing votes was a heinous 'strategy'.

replies(3): >>43411263 #>>43411280 #>>43411333 #
1. righthand ◴[] No.43411333[source]
> All Harris had to do to win was promise to stop sending arms to Israel.

That might be true but it would have set herself up for a lie that would then be weaponized by Trump for another four years. A lot of people in this country don’t want a liar in office, that’s why they didn’t vote Trump.

So while she said she wouldn’t do anything different than Biden on immigration and not stop funding Israel. Those would have been lies if she did. Saying you’ll change things also builds distrust in past government and our well working systems. This rhetoric Trump champions and puts us in the problem we have today. We can see those lies in effect today as Trump ignores the voters he won from briefly talking about Gaza and still funding those wars.

replies(1): >>43411530 #
2. mandmandam ◴[] No.43411530[source]
> it would have set herself up for a lie

No. Committing genocide - murdering tens of thousands of children - nullifies any previous weapons contracts. That's obvious.

Here's the specific law against it [0]. If you want to insist that Harris would be "forced" to keep arming Israel because of contracts, I do hope you'll have a read of it first.

0 - Section 502B of the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA), codified at 22 U.S.C. § 2304(a)

replies(1): >>43411569 #
3. righthand ◴[] No.43411569[source]
Unfortunately like Trump, that spending is out of her hands. That spending like all spending is set by the legislature through bills. She could have done nothing and saying she could is a lie you’re telling yourself.