←back to thread

Grok 3: Another win for the bitter lesson

(www.thealgorithmicbridge.com)
129 points kiyanwang | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ArtTimeInvestor ◴[] No.43112245[source]
It looks like the USA is bringing all technology in-house that is needed to build AI.

TSMC has a factory in the USA now, ASML too. OpenAI, Google, xAI and Nvidia are natively in the USA.

While no other country is even close to build AI on their own.

Is the USA going to "own" the world by becoming the keeper of AI? Or is there an alternative future that has a probability > 0?

replies(7): >>43112250 #>>43112266 #>>43112288 #>>43112313 #>>43113081 #>>43113084 #>>43113181 #
OccamsMirror ◴[] No.43112250[source]
Are LLMs really going to own the world?
replies(3): >>43112275 #>>43112276 #>>43112284 #
ArtTimeInvestor ◴[] No.43112275[source]
It looks like neural network based software is to surpass humans in intelligence in every task in the forseeable future.

If one country moves along this direction faster than the others, no country will stand a chance to compete with them militarily or economically.

replies(3): >>43112439 #>>43112575 #>>43116003 #
hagbarth ◴[] No.43112575[source]
How so? First of all, assuming ASI is developed, as it stands now, it will be owned by a private corporation, not a nation state.

ASI also will not be magic. Like what exactly would it be doing that enables the country to subject the others? Develop new weapons? We already have the capability to destroy earth. Actually come to think of it, if ASI is an existential threat to other nations, maybe the rational action would be to nuke whichever country develops it first. To safe the world.

You see what I am saying? There is such a thing as the real world with real constraints.

replies(1): >>43112736 #
1. ◴[] No.43112736{3}[source]