This article has a strong ChatGPT smell. Things like "in the world of", "let's dive into", the bullet points, "conclusion" section, etc. Anyone else have the same feeling?
I got that feeling because of adjectives like “innovative”. Thought that it might be impolite to imply that in the comments, and was relieved that someone already did.
The premise is straight out of Simon Levene's short film from 2005, "Tube Poker".
The point-allocations are described as in the article at around 03:45.