←back to thread

681 points NetOpWibby | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source

Hey everyone,

About a year ago I embarked on creating a color scheme for a project and I loved it so much I began using it for everything. I decided to make an official repo for it to share with the world.

Anyhoo, hope y'all enjoy it.

Show context
xanderlewis ◴[] No.43073231[source]
Is there any reason to use the word uchu? It seems like almost everything (colour schemes, AI models, startups, tools, apps, ...) is named using a single randomly-selected Japanese word these days. But... why?
replies(16): >>43073264 #>>43073269 #>>43073299 #>>43073314 #>>43073328 #>>43073329 #>>43073340 #>>43073484 #>>43073758 #>>43073814 #>>43073848 #>>43075627 #>>43077206 #>>43079830 #>>43083979 #>>43101560 #
freeopinion ◴[] No.43073848[source]
Does it bother you to have a product name like Galaxy or Forester?

It seems very odd to me that somebody would complain about single-word product names. Or are you complaining about the origin language? Or are you just jealous that somebody is using a two-syllable word instead of something like Navigator? Or perhaps you are peeved it isn't a single-syllable name like Chrome. Is a word like Ubuntu ok if it isn't Japanese? Or do you mean that words like Twitter and Yahoo should be phased out and everything should just be a single letter like X?

replies(3): >>43075167 #>>43076952 #>>43102361 #
xanderlewis ◴[] No.43076952[source]
I'm not as bothered by it as you seem to think; I was more just pointing out that the trend of naming everything after random Japanese words is a bit stale — especially if there's no relation to Japan and you don't speak Japanese.

> Or do you mean that words like Twitter and Yahoo should be phased out and everything should just be a single letter like X?

Yes. Apart from my children, who will be named things like X Æ A-Xii.

replies(2): >>43081496 #>>43082114 #
culi ◴[] No.43081496[source]
Pinterest names their design system "Gestalt" but they're not a German company. GitLab names theirs "Pajamas" but they're not primarily Urdu speaking.
replies(1): >>43082206 #
xanderlewis ◴[] No.43082206{3}[source]
Your second example is a bit disingenuous since the word ‘pyjamas’ is a perfectly normal English word, regardless of its etymology.

As for the first: there isn’t a silly trend of naming everything after randomly-chosen German words, so at least it’s fairly original.

replies(2): >>43085291 #>>43091904 #
1. culi ◴[] No.43085291{4}[source]
I picked the second example exactly to elicit a response such as yours.

It's ultimately a word from a foreign language. At some point it got used by English-speakers and then it spread and got used more and more.

Lots of foreign words get used. Some catch on and some don't. That's just how language evolves. Pajamas is just an example of a foreign word in a late stage of this evolution

replies(1): >>43120004 #
2. xanderlewis ◴[] No.43120004[source]
In that case I don't see your point. We're talking about words that are entirely foreign — not loanwords.