←back to thread

612 points meetpateltech | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
1. starchild3001 ◴[] No.42959276[source]
I use all top of the line models everyday. Not for coding, but for general "cognitive" tasks like research, thinking, analysis, writing etc. What Google calls Gemini Pro 2.0 has been my most favorite model for the past couple of months. I think o1/4o come pretty close. Those are kinda equals, with a slight preference for Gemini. Claude has fallen behind, clearly. DeepSeek is intriguing. It excels occassionally where others won't. For consistency's sake, Gemini Pro 2.0 is amazing.

I highly recommend using it via https://aistudio.google.com/. Gemini app has some additional bells and whistles, but for some reason quality isn't always on par with aistudio. Also Gemini app seems to have more filters -- it seems more shy answering controversial topics. Just some general impressions.

replies(1): >>42959396 #
2. tnias23 ◴[] No.42959396[source]
do you mean "Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental 02-05"? too many similarly named models
replies(1): >>42959784 #
3. starchild3001 ◴[] No.42959784[source]
Yes.
replies(1): >>42965815 #
4. novok ◴[] No.42965815{3}[source]
How do you get around all the censorship? Gemini is even worse than Claude at times. And it's for things like "Obama's chili recipe" or "find the source of X person's science paper where they talked about Y in another language".
replies(1): >>42965933 #
5. starchild3001 ◴[] No.42965933{4}[source]
Not a major problem in my experience if you use the aistudio version of the model. Claude tends to be the most conservative in my experience. Gemini 2.0 and 4o appear similar.