←back to thread

Eggs US – Price – Chart

(tradingeconomics.com)
643 points throwaway5752 | 1 comments | 05 Feb 25 16:31 UTC | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
cortesoft ◴[05 Feb 25 16:36 UTC] No.42951014[source]▶
Yeah, bird flu is really bad.
replies(7): >>42951084 #>>42951089 #>>42951101 #>>42951106 #>>42951123 #>>42951207 #>>42951225 #
llamaimperative ◴[05 Feb 25 16:39 UTC] No.42951089[source]▶
This is why we must freeze USDA funding, halt all public health communications from our federal government, and urgently (TOP PRIORITY!!!) scrub all mentions of the word "women" from every public-facing piece of scientific content we can find.
replies(5): >>42951144 #>>42951148 #>>42951175 #>>42951214 #>>42951919 #
Xunjin ◴[05 Feb 25 16:42 UTC] No.42951148[source]▶
I hope they stop this cultural war and focus on the real problems that actually affects the population,for example, high prices.
replies(8): >>42951173 #>>42951222 #>>42951233 #>>42951285 #>>42951370 #>>42951929 #>>42952494 #>>42964082 #
rcpt ◴[05 Feb 25 16:54 UTC] No.42951370[source]▶
Prices aren't high on anything except for housing.

No politician, either past present or future, will ever run on a platform of reducing housing prices.

replies(2): >>42951671 #>>42954550 #
llamaimperative ◴[05 Feb 25 17:08 UTC] No.42951671[source]▶
Here are several specific proposals to do just that: https://nlihc.org/resource/harris-campaign-releases-plans-lo...

Not a fan of credits to buyers (just inflates prices further) but I'm a big fan of credits to developers, streamlining permitting, and making some federal land available for development.

Regardless of whether you think these are good policies or an effective platform, it is patently false to say no one would run on such a promise.

replies(2): >>42951854 #>>42959270 #
1. jquery ◴[06 Feb 25 05:02 UTC] No.42959270[source]▶
I'd rather the government build the houses directly, I'm tired of America's solution to everything is to let middlemen skim huge profits (same issue in health care and education).