←back to thread

757 points headalgorithm | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.405s | source
Show context
snapcaster ◴[] No.42952889[source]
I think "being informed" is very overrated in general. Often it means being informed about palace intrigue and intelligence service/corporate narratives. I would say that in general media consumption or "staying informed" should be seen as a vice not a virtue
replies(5): >>42953207 #>>42954967 #>>42955308 #>>42957316 #>>42964915 #
1. stackedinserter ◴[] No.42955308[source]
It's not overrated, it's often confused with "to understand what's happening".

To "be informed" is like to take a look at a chess or go board: positions are clear, black and white pieces are here and there, but it takes skill to really understand the current dynamics of a game.

Add media bias ("let's show the board at this angle that looks better for our side") and now we have "informed" population that's being surprised by reality every day.

replies(1): >>42964532 #
2. svilen_dobrev ◴[] No.42964532[source]
in some handwavy simplification:

[start] data --(meaning/interpretation)--> information --(interpretation/understanding)-> knowledge ----> ...

probably more levels. At any step one can take action.. faster if more to the start but also less thoughtfull/"correct". primal instincts are at the start

the whole point of news-machine is to never get to beyond information.. same as <2sec video-frame switching..