←back to thread

112 points curl-up | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
jasonjmcghee ◴[] No.42742715[source]
I've periodically seen lightcell and danielle fong in various news / reddit /forums over the last few years and it always seems to be steeped in controversy.

I know next to nothing about the field / tech, but a portion of folks seem to be like "incredible visionary etc. etc." and the another portion like "fringe science / complete bullshit / this is as realistic as cold fusion" kind of thing.

Very interested to hear from folks more in the know of like, high level long term viability / what the implications are etc.

replies(4): >>42743341 #>>42744115 #>>42744154 #>>42744960 #
1. sesm ◴[] No.42744115[source]
It's not like cold fusion, the lightcell is based on well-understood physics. The author may be too optimistic with efficiency claim, but those are relatively easy to verify independently.