←back to thread

113 points curl-up | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
jasonjmcghee ◴[] No.42742715[source]
I've periodically seen lightcell and danielle fong in various news / reddit /forums over the last few years and it always seems to be steeped in controversy.

I know next to nothing about the field / tech, but a portion of folks seem to be like "incredible visionary etc. etc." and the another portion like "fringe science / complete bullshit / this is as realistic as cold fusion" kind of thing.

Very interested to hear from folks more in the know of like, high level long term viability / what the implications are etc.

replies(4): >>42743341 #>>42744115 #>>42744154 #>>42744960 #
1. thot_experiment ◴[] No.42743341[source]
It's a very good idea that is worth pursuing, they are pursuing it. There are many many many problems that need solving between here and "this is a better way to make energy from heat at scale than turning water into steam and spinning a turbine". The science is fundamentally sound but we're nowhere near economic viability.