←back to thread

113 points curl-up | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source | bottom
Show context
josefritzishere ◴[] No.42742646[source]
The solar panel conversion of sunlight to usable energy to around 20%, with a theoretical max of 30%. So it's better than that.
replies(3): >>42742971 #>>42743106 #>>42743330 #
1. qayxc ◴[] No.42742971[source]
That can't be true. The current record for non-concentrating cells is 39.5% efficiency using triple junction cells [1]

Concentrating cells are at 47.6% [2]

[1] https://www.cell.com/joule/fulltext/S2542-4351(22)00191-X

[2] https://publica-rest.fraunhofer.de/server/api/core/bitstream...

replies(3): >>42743521 #>>42743892 #>>42744128 #
2. sroussey ◴[] No.42743521[source]
Isn’t that for sunlight though? I imagine if you have a source that only radiates a single wavelength, you could make a collector for that specific wavelength that’s more efficient than some general case one. Could be wrong though.
3. choilive ◴[] No.42743892[source]
The innovation here is you have a system that emits monochromatic light, and you have solar cells tuned specifically for that bandgap, plus the system is also "naturally" concentrating because the light output is incredibly bright. 3000 suns vs 500-1000 suns in typical CPV, plus they also do waste heat recycling. End-to-end efficiency of 40% is definitely feasible as advertised.
replies(1): >>42745098 #
4. MalbertKerman ◴[] No.42744128[source]
It's only true for a single junction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shockley%E2%80%93Queisser_limi...

Multi-junction cells beat that limit, but they're still horribly expensive to manufacture which confines them to niche uses like spacecraft.

replies(1): >>42745100 #
5. DaniFong ◴[] No.42745098[source]
correct
6. DaniFong ◴[] No.42745100[source]
we're bootstrapping off the multijunction production while using just a single junction that matches the sodium D light well