←back to thread

781 points HelloUsername | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
nerdjon ◴[] No.42725322[source]
Happy to see that Nintendo is treating the switch more like how they traditionally handled their mobile platforms instead of their consoles.

Iterating instead of throwing out everything with each new version. There is a part of me that is going to miss the, do weird shit and see what works, Nintendo that brought us some really fun ideas. But a stable Nintendo just being able to continue putting out great games has its advantages.

I am curious about the specs, but honestly don't care much. The only real issue the Switch had was being able to keep up with some of the games put on it with FPS but it still had beautiful games (like Tears of the Kingdom). So as long as it is actually a decent spec bump I am happy and have zero care to compare it to the other consoles (but I am sure people are going too and scream that it is "underpowered").

The biggest thing I am curious about, will it be OLED since that will be disappointing to go back to non OLED from the OLED Switch. And Price.

replies(14): >>42725406 #>>42725620 #>>42725623 #>>42726594 #>>42727079 #>>42727591 #>>42727785 #>>42728681 #>>42728750 #>>42729685 #>>42729885 #>>42731412 #>>42733275 #>>42837431 #
bargainbin ◴[] No.42727079[source]
They’ve got the weird shit covered still, apparently the joy cons in this gen can be used as mice.

Was heavily rumoured/leaked and this teaser video literally shows them gliding along a surface.

How Nintendo will leverage that functionality, who could honestly say, but that’s the genius of keeping a toy company mindset in an industry full of sports car company mindsets.

replies(6): >>42727232 #>>42727379 #>>42727779 #>>42727813 #>>42728517 #>>42728748 #
adamc ◴[] No.42727232[source]
That last sentence is worth an essay of its own. Everyone else keeps pumping resources into being photo-realistic blah-blah-blah without nearly enough attention to "is this fun"?
replies(10): >>42727589 #>>42727650 #>>42727886 #>>42728293 #>>42728326 #>>42731095 #>>42731853 #>>42732280 #>>42734314 #>>42734667 #
adriand ◴[] No.42728293[source]
I can't remember where I read this, but I came across someone talking about the fact that these AAA photo realistic games are hugely expensive to make, but if you look at what young people are spending their time playing, they're games like Fornite, Minecraft and Roblox. As soon as I read this, it clicked for me.

I have two teenagers (15 & 17) and this is exactly right. My son plays games all the time and although he's played Elden Ring and GTA and other games of that sort, over the years I would say 80% of his time has been Minecraft and this other 2D game with a platformer vibe whose name I forget that has procedurally generated maps. He's frequently calling me over to his computer to check out his latest architectural creation in Minecraft. I know it's not just him, because he plays multiplayer with his buddies as well, and again, a lot of it is these games with quite frankly primitive graphics. But they're fun!

replies(3): >>42728869 #>>42732139 #>>42734684 #
1. incanus77 ◴[] No.42734684[source]
Perhaps it was this, which I saw recently:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/26/arts/video-games-graphics...