←back to thread

781 points HelloUsername | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
VyseofArcadia ◴[] No.42725103[source]
I don't like the aesthetic as much as the Switch 1. Looks a little too sleek, too monochrome, not Nintendo-y enough. Other than the splash of color around the thumbsticks it looks like any number of those handheld Steam Deck-alikes that have been coming out.

That said I always wait for the special Zelda editions of Nintendo's consoles, so I don't know that I have standing to complain.

replies(8): >>42725150 #>>42725196 #>>42725279 #>>42726618 #>>42726856 #>>42728216 #>>42730334 #>>42731936 #
talles ◴[] No.42725279[source]
Nintendo is not Nintendo-y enough for a while now. The switch system UI is bland and on launch the gray switch was the one being presented.
replies(3): >>42725337 #>>42725526 #>>42725990 #
VyseofArcadia ◴[] No.42725337[source]
Yeah, I am not a big fan of the Switch UI. They really took out the "surprise and delight" compared to the Wii U and 3DS. Very bland and straightforward, and yet somehow awfully slow and laggy.
replies(3): >>42726461 #>>42728479 #>>42731967 #
gjsman-1000 ◴[] No.42728479{3}[source]
There's a very good reason for this: The whole OS is under 400MB. Every Nintendo Switch game cartridge comes with a full copy of the necessary OS on it.

Every game card is playable, no matter how out of date the Switch is, without any internet connection.

I'll take that kind of functionality before "surprise and delight." We might get "surprise and delight" this generation though, if in part because the change to a modified Samsung NAND over Macronix might be cheaper at larger capacities if rumors are correct.

replies(2): >>42728747 #>>42729418 #
Dylan16807 ◴[] No.42728747{4}[source]
400MB is huge, and cute touches can be very small.
replies(1): >>42729378 #
1. gjsman-1000 ◴[] No.42729378{5}[source]
It's not that large considering the size of NVIDIA drivers + WebKit alone.

By comparison, the Wii U with it's "nice touches" was over 5 GB.

replies(1): >>42731877 #
2. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.42731877[source]
The necessary OS for running the game doesn't need webkit, and I doubt the important part of the nvidia drivers is super big.
replies(1): >>42732095 #
3. easton ◴[] No.42732095[source]
I would doubt they made a build of the OS without webkit, or else you’d have a OS without captive portal or eShop support. Feels annoying.