←back to thread

623 points magicalhippo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
quick_brown_fox ◴[] No.42620719[source]
How about “We sell a computer called the tinybox. It comes in two colors + pro.

tinybox red and green are for people looking for a quiet home/office machine. tinybox pro is for people looking for a loud compact rack machine.” [0]

[0] https://tinygrad.org/#tinybox

replies(4): >>42620758 #>>42621266 #>>42621741 #>>42623779 #
loudmax ◴[] No.42623779[source]
Going by the specs, this pretty much blows Tinybox out of the water.

For $40,000, a Tinybox pro is advertised as offering 1.36 petaflops processing and 192 GB VRAM.

For about $6,000 a pair of Nvidia Project Digits offer about a combined 2 petaflops processing and 256 GB VRAM.

The market segment for Tinybox always seemed to be people that were somewhat price-insensitive, but unless Nvidia completely fumbles on execution, I struggle to think of any benefits of a Tinygrad Tinybox over an Nvidia Digits. Maybe if you absolutely, positively, need to run your OS on x86.

I'd love to see if AMD or Intel has a response to these. I'm not holding my breath.

replies(2): >>42624000 #>>42626120 #
1. elorant ◴[] No.42626120[source]
You're missing the most critical part though. Memory bandwidth. It hasn't been announced yet for Digits and it probably won't be comparable to that of dedicated GPUs.