←back to thread

33 points nabla9 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
gtmitchell ◴[] No.42480657[source]
I think this result is obvious to anyone who has spent any time in the academic world, although it is nice to see some solid numbers behind it.

The harsh truth is that key to academic career advancement is who you know much more than what you know. I every single person I knew in graduate school who got a postdoc position did so through informal means (i.e. knowing someone who knew someone), and having letters of recommendation written by the right people from the right departments at the right schools opens all sorts of doors to the academic hierarchy that would otherwise be closed.

replies(2): >>42481255 #>>42481684 #
1. Ar-Curunir ◴[] No.42481684[source]
I think you overstate this effect. At least in CS, it’s better to get a strong letter from a good (but maybe not superstar) researcher than it is to get a lukewarm letter from a Turing award winner.

reputation is a currency in academia, and even people in prestigious positions arent usually going to spend it to get someone mediocre into a top position.