Most of the comments so far are about the temperature and the closeness to the sun, and, hey, I get it: those are both amazing to think about. But to me even more amazing is... 0.16% of the speed of light?? Yikes.
replies(3):
Light can travel over 34,000km in that time. The great arc distance from LA to Sydney is just over 12,000km. In all likelihood the fiber line connecting them doesn't follow that arc, but it shouldn't be too far out of limits. So about 2/3 of the latency is caused by relays and switching equipment.
it gets even worse for satellite, because (until starlink) communications satellites are in geosynchronous orbit, 35,000km above the equator. so talking on one means a 70km round trip, which causes its path to take over 5x more distance than the linear distance (across the surface) between those 2 cities.
I guess everything with a sun slingshot is going to be impressive.
We'd have 1% speed-of-causality probes by now if it meant better war machines but best they can do with the budget
Vaguely related they did capture light moving with a 1 billion frames per second experiment so Femtosecond Photography is definitely some cutting edge stuff.
12,000km ?
Not really; the speed of light in fiber optic cable is only about two-thirds of that in a vacuum. That means it takes light about ~60ms to travel the 12,000km great arc distance.
No. There were and are other communication satellites in lower orbits. SpaceX did not invent the concept of low-orbit communications satellites. The first satellites of the 90+ Iridium constellation were launched in the late 90s. That system is still online in low orbit today. Before that there were various military/state-owned satellites. The Soviet Union and Russia were big on providing coms to areas where the geo-stationary relays could not, specifically the north, as far back as the 60s. See the Molnya program.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molniya_(satellite)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium_satellite_constellatio...