←back to thread

349 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
Izkata ◴[] No.42473930[source]
> But, according to data released Tuesday, the number of eighth, 10th, and 12th graders who collectively abstained from the use of alcohol, marijuana, or nicotine hit a new high this year. Use of illicit drugs also fell on the whole and use of non-heroin narcotics (Vicodin, OxyContin, Percocet) hit an all-time low.

From an unexpected conversation with some younger people not long ago (though not this young), they may have just switched to LSD.

replies(4): >>42473936 #>>42474008 #>>42474085 #>>42474402 #
fullshark ◴[] No.42473936[source]
They switched to smartphones
replies(1): >>42474114 #
smartmic ◴[] No.42474114[source]
This. And what about the psychosocial consequences, will it be an improvement compared to the other substances? I doubt it.
replies(2): >>42474163 #>>42474330 #
prerok ◴[] No.42474163[source]
While I don't think smartphone addiction should be taken lightly, it's still a far cry from substance abuse.
replies(2): >>42474443 #>>42474794 #
1. s1artibartfast ◴[] No.42474443[source]
I'm not so sure, especially if you look at the sum societal impact, and not just the worst outcomes.

My personal take is that the net social impact is positive for alcohol, marijuana, hallucinogens, and maybe some of the party drugs. For most people, they tend to be a social lubricant, tool for exploration, and source of fun.

I think that smartphone use probably balances out negatively. I think for most people, they have a pretty severe negative impact on their lives, and for some, an extremely negative impact.

The worst outcomes for drug use are probably worse than those for smartphones, but not by too much in my opinion.