←back to thread

How good are American roads?

(www.construction-physics.com)
193 points chmaynard | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rconti ◴[] No.42196461[source]
> Interestingly, in all cases urban roads are worse quality than rural roads, presumably because they see higher traffic than rural roads.

There's more infrastructure under urban roads. Crews come in to fix some utility, shred a section of a lane, patch it poorly with dissimilar materials, and leave.

replies(12): >>42196522 #>>42196736 #>>42197205 #>>42197899 #>>42198008 #>>42198655 #>>42198873 #>>42199005 #>>42199037 #>>42200024 #>>42201080 #>>42201777 #
burnte ◴[] No.42197899[source]
This happens CONSTANTLY in Atlanta. They'll spend a bunch of money fixing a road, then a month later Public Works digs a huge hole and leaves a steel plate on it for a year, then patch it with either concrete that is an inch or two below the rest of the surface, or they don't pack the earth they put back and in 3 months the patch has sunk into a new pothole in a brand new road. The city has been trying to force public works to go do those things BEFORE road projects, but it's an uphill battle.
replies(6): >>42198036 #>>42198339 #>>42199443 #>>42201491 #>>42201616 #>>42201698 #
ASalazarMX ◴[] No.42198036[source]
This happens in other countries too. Some people theorize that it's done because of internal rivalries between dependencies/political factions, but I suspect local governments are just inept at logistics.
replies(6): >>42198299 #>>42198331 #>>42198752 #>>42200762 #>>42201831 #>>42201951 #
jakjak123 ◴[] No.42198299[source]
Its also a difficult problem. They need the right digger and the right crew at the right time and possibly the right weather to get the job done. Many times there will be weeks of juggling around schedules and suddenly the digging started three weeks after the road was finished
replies(1): >>42198428 #
lo_zamoyski ◴[] No.42198428[source]
Let me ask you: how many buildings collapsed during the reign of Hammurabi?
replies(6): >>42198493 #>>42198587 #>>42198595 #>>42198690 #>>42199178 #>>42201366 #
Carrok ◴[] No.42198493[source]
I.. I have no idea. I don't even know who Hammurabi is.

Is there a point you're trying to make? If so, care to enlighten us without assuming we all have history degrees?

replies(7): >>42198540 #>>42198576 #>>42198585 #>>42198619 #>>42198672 #>>42200503 #>>42202324 #
yulker ◴[] No.42198585[source]
Not obscure enough of a figure to necessitate a history degree. Well known for being one of the first to establish building codes.
replies(1): >>42199380 #
tharkun__ ◴[] No.42199380[source]
Yet many including myself have never heard of him.

Would it have been so much to ask to put a Wikipedia link and nerd-snipe some of us in the process?

replies(2): >>42199489 #>>42200296 #
shiroiushi ◴[] No.42199489[source]
Anyone with a basic high school education should have heard of him.

And how hard it is for you to google for "wikipedia hammurabi" anyway?

replies(1): >>42199521 #
johnnyanmac ◴[] No.42199521[source]
>Hammurabi is best known for having issued the Code of Hammurabi, which he claimed to have received from Shamash, the Babylonian god of justice. Unlike earlier Sumerian law codes, such as the Code of Ur-Nammu, which had focused on compensating the victim of the crime, the Law of Hammurabi was one of the first law codes to place greater emphasis on the physical punishment of the perpetrator.

I don't think Wikipedia gets to the point quickly enough for this context to be relevant.

replies(1): >>42199793 #
shiroiushi ◴[] No.42199793[source]
That's a valid point, but I was just responding to someone who claimed that Hammurabi was so obscure that (in their minds) no one had heard of him, and additionally complained that there was no Wikipedia link. I feel like I should have used LMGTFY.

Whether the OP was making a poorly-articulated point by merely bringing up Hammurabi and expecting the reader to know about his history with building codes, I think, is a separate issue. Anyone with a basic education should have heard of Hammurabi, though they may have forgotten the specifics about him. And finding a Wikipedia link on your own is trivial.

replies(1): >>42200331 #
tharkun__ ◴[] No.42200331{3}[source]
I did not claim that he was obscure nor that no one had heard of him.

I merely mentioned that your and other claims that "anyone with a high school education has to have heard of him" is bollocks.

I have both a high school and university degree and have never heard of him and don't think I need to have.

Now you even claim someone with a "basic education" should've heard of him (meaning someone that didn't even finish high school). If you doubt that, Google about different countries' school systems and what would go for "basic" education.

That said you definitely would've nerd sniped me with a link and if these replies here on HN hadn't been there to catch my interest first I would have just googled him.

Basically by trying to be a smart ass and belittling others you harmed your own cause so to speak.

replies(2): >>42200351 #>>42201754 #
1. thaumasiotes ◴[] No.42201754{4}[source]
> I merely mentioned that your and other claims that "anyone with a high school education has to have heard of him" is bollocks.

> I have both a high school and university degree and have never heard of him

With all due respect, it's far more likely that you have heard of him, but you didn't retain the information.