←back to thread

How good are American roads?

(www.construction-physics.com)
192 points chmaynard | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.978s | source
Show context
rconti ◴[] No.42196461[source]
> Interestingly, in all cases urban roads are worse quality than rural roads, presumably because they see higher traffic than rural roads.

There's more infrastructure under urban roads. Crews come in to fix some utility, shred a section of a lane, patch it poorly with dissimilar materials, and leave.

replies(12): >>42196522 #>>42196736 #>>42197205 #>>42197899 #>>42198008 #>>42198655 #>>42198873 #>>42199005 #>>42199037 #>>42200024 #>>42201080 #>>42201777 #
burnte ◴[] No.42197899[source]
This happens CONSTANTLY in Atlanta. They'll spend a bunch of money fixing a road, then a month later Public Works digs a huge hole and leaves a steel plate on it for a year, then patch it with either concrete that is an inch or two below the rest of the surface, or they don't pack the earth they put back and in 3 months the patch has sunk into a new pothole in a brand new road. The city has been trying to force public works to go do those things BEFORE road projects, but it's an uphill battle.
replies(6): >>42198036 #>>42198339 #>>42199443 #>>42201491 #>>42201616 #>>42201698 #
ASalazarMX ◴[] No.42198036[source]
This happens in other countries too. Some people theorize that it's done because of internal rivalries between dependencies/political factions, but I suspect local governments are just inept at logistics.
replies(6): >>42198299 #>>42198331 #>>42198752 #>>42200762 #>>42201831 #>>42201951 #
jakjak123 ◴[] No.42198299[source]
Its also a difficult problem. They need the right digger and the right crew at the right time and possibly the right weather to get the job done. Many times there will be weeks of juggling around schedules and suddenly the digging started three weeks after the road was finished
replies(1): >>42198428 #
lo_zamoyski ◴[] No.42198428[source]
Let me ask you: how many buildings collapsed during the reign of Hammurabi?
replies(6): >>42198493 #>>42198587 #>>42198595 #>>42198690 #>>42199178 #>>42201366 #
Carrok ◴[] No.42198493[source]
I.. I have no idea. I don't even know who Hammurabi is.

Is there a point you're trying to make? If so, care to enlighten us without assuming we all have history degrees?

replies(7): >>42198540 #>>42198576 #>>42198585 #>>42198619 #>>42198672 #>>42200503 #>>42202324 #
yulker ◴[] No.42198585[source]
Not obscure enough of a figure to necessitate a history degree. Well known for being one of the first to establish building codes.
replies(1): >>42199380 #
tharkun__ ◴[] No.42199380[source]
Yet many including myself have never heard of him.

Would it have been so much to ask to put a Wikipedia link and nerd-snipe some of us in the process?

replies(2): >>42199489 #>>42200296 #
PittleyDunkin ◴[] No.42200296[source]
Would it be so hard to google an unknown figure? Jesus christ, open the schools. If you're confused there's much less hostile ways to indicate you want explanation.
replies(1): >>42200362 #
tharkun__ ◴[] No.42200362[source]
For me it's not so much about that but the "how".

Parent definitely would've nerd sniped me with a link and if these replies here on HN hadn't been there to catch my interest first I would have just googled him.

Basically by trying to be a smart ass and belittling others they harmed their own cause of making Hammurabi more widely known.

replies(1): >>42200527 #
Dylan16807 ◴[] No.42200527[source]
> Basically by trying to be a smart ass and belittling others

You are reading way too much into someone not documenting their comment.

> they harmed their own cause

To me it looks like you and others paid even more attention this way.

> their own cause of making Hammurabi more widely known

I don't think that was their goal?

replies(1): >>42200576 #
1. tharkun__ ◴[] No.42200576[source]
I might actually agree with you if I hadn't read all the other replies shiroiushi has made since. I firmly believe he's out on some crusade to belittle everyone he can now that didn't have the exact same education as him.

Or just do it for kicks and to feel better about himself.

replies(1): >>42200900 #
2. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.42200900[source]
> all the other replies shiroiushi has made

But it's lo_zamoyski that made the reference.

replies(1): >>42201139 #
3. tharkun__ ◴[] No.42201139[source]
And yulker is the one that I replied to. That's all fair enough and yes yulker had quite some passive aggressiveness swinging in that "doesn't need a history degree" to start with.

Yet shiroiushi is the one directly insulting my (and others that I'm referencing as not having had to have heard of him)'s education without knowing anything about said education.

Depending on very specific and exact place of upbringing and schooling, there are a myriad of differences in what is regular curriculum or not. This is a global forum too, so it's even "worse" in that sense for making very absolute statements like shiroiushi has.

Has every Bachelor of Computer Science had to take a course that included learning about how regular expressions are implemented and had to implement a regular expression parser? I sure did, mandatory course and wouldn't have been able to get the BA and then go on from that even further without it at my university. Yet I've met people from other universities that didn't. Do I insult them and their education for it? I don't!

replies(1): >>42201463 #
4. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.42201463{3}[source]
Well you said "parent" so I thought you didn't mean shiroiushi. Yes shiroiushi is being belittling, thanks for the clarification of what you meant then.